Most of the elite media have made it clear in both their opinion and news pages that they want to see benefits cut. In keeping with this position they highlight the views of political figures who push cuts to the program, treating them as responsible, while those who oppose cuts are ignored or mocked.This pattern of coverage was clearly on display last weekend. Both the New York Times and Washington Post decided to ignore the Senate's passage by voice vote of the Sanders Amendment.
-- Truthout
One would have thought that a vote by the Senate to reject cuts in benefits to Social Security would have been big news. Not so, according to Truthout. This news was simply ignored by the major media.
But the reality was indeed that the Senate voted not to change the way cost-of-living increases are determined which would have resulted in a 3% cut in benefits over 20 years, according to the Truthout web site.
This leaves web sites like Truthout and blogs like this one to report the truth. While I eagerly accept the challenge of passing along this news, it means any meaningful opposition media in the United States is essentially dead. This leaves Internet media and a few print journals as the only true advocates for the people.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment to "The Musical Patriot." Moderation is used on this blog to help prevent spam and other inappropriate messages. Please complete this form so your comment may be processed for possible inclusion on the blog. Thank you for being a reader of "The Musical Patriot!"